Deprecated: Optional parameter $output declared before required parameter $atts is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/newsfqwf/kechambers/wp-content/themes/themes/publisher2/includes/libs/bs-theme-core/gallery-slider/class-publisher-theme-gallery-slider.php on line 67

Deprecated: uksort(): Returning bool from comparison function is deprecated, return an integer less than, equal to, or greater than zero in /home/newsfqwf/kechambers/wp-content/themes/themes/publisher2/includes/libs/better-framework/compatibility/class-bf-version-compatibility.php on line 139
West Palm Beach to hold workshop on artificial turf front lawns – kechambers

West Palm Beach to hold workshop on artificial turf front lawns

During the pandemic, Chic Price and his wife would go on walks through his neighborhood off Putnam Road in West Palm Beach.

He noticed that some of his neighbors had replaced the grass in their front yard with artificial turf.

It seemed like a good idea for his yard, too. The artificial grass would allow him to cut back on water usage, and it wouldn’t require the chemicals lawns frequently need.

So, in January, Price, a retired paramedic who sells medical supplies, decided to spend $10,000 having artificial turf installed in his front yard.

Neighbors, he said, frequently commented on how beautiful his yard looked.

Price and his neighbors might have liked the new artificial lawn, but the city of West Palm Beach did not.

The city’s code enforcement rules allow turf to be used on the sides and back of homes, but it is not allowed in the front of them.

Price was cited and found.

He rallied other residents using artificial turf, urging them to ask city officials to reconsider the front-yard ban, which he calls “ridiculous.”

They wrote emails and attended City Commission meetings to tell commissioners artificial grass saves water and reduces the use of chemicals.

Their collective pleas didn’t fall on deaf ears.

Why West Palm banned fake turf on front lawns three years ago

The city plans to hold a morning workshop Aug. 2 to discuss its ban on artificial turf in front yards.

That ban was put in place three years ago when the city amended its landscaping code.

Several factors went into the city’s decision.

“The prevailing thought was we did not want the turf to be visible from the street,” said Rick Greene, the city’s Development Services director, who oversees the city’s code.

There were other concerns, too.

Artificial grass does not drain as well as natural grass, Greene said, and there are worries it traps heat and emits toxic fumes at high temperatures.

Artificial turf is evolving, however, and it could be safer now than it was a few years ago.

“That’s exactly what we’re researching now,” Greene said.

Whether a Palm Beach County resident can use artificial turf in their front yard depends on where they live in the county.

Boca Raton does not allow it in front yards, nor does Wellington or Boynton Beach.

Residents in Delray Beach can submit an application to use artificial turf, which can’t cover more than 20 percent of the home’s landscaped area. The town of Palm Beach at its May 20 meeting discussed an ordinance to draft a policy that would more strictly regulate the use of artificial turf.

The case for artificial turf: scarcity of water, environmental benefits

In the American West, which is battling a crippling drought, states have taken action to conserve water.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked residents to voluntarily conserve water, a request critics said doesn’t go far enough to deal with the water crisis the state is likely to face if the drought continues.

Nevada has banned grass in areas such as the entrances to housing developments, office parks and street medians. The ban, signed into law in June, does not cover golf courses, single-family homes or parks.

Cylindrospermopsin: Records reveal inside story on why West Palm scrambled to respond to water toxin issue

More: West Palm Beach approves lease with developer to refurbish golf course

More: Palm Beach County is now in a ‘moderate drought’ but rainy season is here

Florida isn’t as parched as the American West, but worries about climate change has brought a sharper focus here on the coming scarcity of water.

Some residents are taking matters into their own hands.

“We’ve noticed over the last year that there are more residents who have installed artificial turf,” Greene said.

This year, his staff began calling installers to let them know that a permit is required for the use of such grass.

Price said he is not aware of any resident who had artificial turf installed in their front yard knowing it was against city code.

He said he conducted an informal survey this year and found 60 homeowners in the southern portion of West Palm Beach who had installed artificial turf in their front yard.

The benefits, he said, are too important to ignore.

Price said his water usage was reduced by two-thirds. The maintenance and water-saving costs are the same reason many professional, college and even high school football stadiums — like Wellington High — have shifted to the concept.

And he liked the other environmental benefits.

“I realized that our water system is finite,” he said. “You don’t have to use harmful chemicals that go into the drainage system and kill manatees.”

A record number of manatees have died in Florida this year.

Experts say boat strikes remain a big killer of the animals, but many others are dying because of the absence of their primary food source — sea grasses.

Water pollution is thought to be the cause of the sea grass loss. It’s not clear what role, if any, lawn chemicals play in that water pollution.

Price said he could easily see how water from fertilized and chemically sprayed lawns can end up in the city’s drainage system and into local waterways.

Artificial grass, Price said, doesn’t need to be watered or sprayed.

PHOTOS: Artificial lawns saving water in California

Artificial turf OK for side and back lawns

If it was so bad, Price said, why is it allowed in the back and side of homes but not in the front?

“Nobody can tell me why they don’t allow it in the front yard,” he said. “It makes no sense whatsoever.”

Commissioner Christina Lambert said that, like Price, she does not understand why fake turf is allowed in the side and back of homes but not in the front.

“‘I’ve been asking the same question,” she said.

The upcoming workshop will give her and her colleagues and a chance to learn about turf and whether it can be a tool the city uses in its battle against climate change.

“Water is a growing concern,” she said. “We have to take that into consideration. I think we need to look at all of that — water usage, pesticides, environmental impacts. All of it.”

Whatever the city does, it won’t change things for price.

After incurring what he estimates to be $800 to $1,000 in fines, which he said were increasing at a rate of $100 per day, Price had his artificial turf removed.

“I succumbed to the pressure,” he said.

It cost $4,500 to have the artificial turf removed and replaced with real grass.

“Because it’s new sod, I’m watering every day now,” he said.

wwashington@pbpost.com

Comments are closed.